EA Analytics · Case File No. 001

From gut feel to a system the team runs itself.

Series A, agentless IT infrastructure mapping, ~50 people. Three months of GTM analytics, shown below in the client's real numbers, shared with permission.

Leads scored
4,273 · two years of CRM
Best segment
3.8x average conversion
Forecast test
off by one win
Engagement
3 months, then self-running
01

Every lead, scored against who actually buys

The sales team was prioritizing by hand. Two years of leads went through a scoring model built on closed-won evidence. This is what came out.

Exhibit A · interactive · 4,273 leads, four tiers

Most of the leads sit in tiers that barely convert. Click through the views. That flip is the whole business case.

665 leads got two years of calls and produced zero revenue. The top tier converts at 3.8x the average, and nobody knew it existed. The score now runs live in Salesforce; the second finding, a separate 10,000+ employee "whale" segment with year-long cycles, gets its own playbook.

Faddom
"I don't dig into lead details anymore. I go straight to the score."
Omer Rabinowitz, Co-Founder & Chief Growth Officer, Faddom
02

Then the deals started getting bigger

Bigger deals were the company's stated goal when the engagement started. The scoring gave that goal teeth: targeting refined against the tiers that close big, and every demo priced so progress was visible. Quarter by quarter, the effort showed up in the data:

Exhibit B · interactive · deal size per demo, six quarters

// hover any quarter · pipeline potential = servers discussed on the demo × $40, deliberately conservative

The closed-deal proof

median deal, 2025  $17.6K
median deal, 2026  $39.3K · 2.2x

Mann-Whitney p = 0.009. Not noise.

The demo-size proof

median demo, 2025  150-200 servers
peak quarter, Q1 26  600 servers · 3x

Enterprise (10k+ employee) leads: ~11% of intake in 2025, 2-3x that through 2026.

03

Every demo gets a price tag, in real time

The day a demo happens, it gets a win probability and a conservative ARR estimate. The month's pipeline value exists immediately, and reality fills in behind it. No waiting a quarter to find out whether marketing delivered.

Exhibit C · interactive · live estimates vs what landed, 12 months

// estimates are written the month the demos happen · shaded cohorts still landing: enterprise deals take up to a year · conservative on purpose

The full-year test

estimated  56 wins · $3.47M
closed     57 wins · $4.15M

Off by one win, with revenue landing higher because the deals grew.

Conservative by design

estimated, Mar-Dec 25  $814K
closed     $974K · 1.2x

The team quotes the number in real time, knowing reality lands above it.

04

The watchdog: drift caught, drift fixed

Average ICP score of each week's qualified leads. In early July the line broke below its band. Flagged the same week. Two weeks later it was back in the zone.

Exhibit D · weekly lead quality, 16 weeks

The gold band is the funnel's normal zone (65–72). Without the weekly read, that July dip surfaces at the quarterly review, three months of budget later. With it, the correction happened inside a fortnight.

05

What stayed when the engagement ended

The engagement wrapped in the summer of 2026. The scoring runs live in Salesforce. The team's own monthly metrics are defined in the model's terms: "good leads" means the top two tiers, and pipeline targets use the demo-level estimates. The forecasts stay on record for a scheduled review.

I

Monthly funnel report

Spend, quality, demos, pipeline, wins. Operational and cohort views, so B2B lag stops distorting the story.

II

Pipeline estimated per demo

Deliberately conservative. Deals close above the estimate, so the number is one the team commits to.

III

Weekly quality watchdog

Lead-quality drift surfaces in weeks, not quarters. Exhibit D shows it working.

IV

The whale ledger

Every 10,000+ employee lead tracked from lead to demo to opportunity, on milestones that respect a year-long cycle.

Faddom
"I can now show up at a conference and brag about how we measure our funnel."
Omer Rabinowitz, Co-Founder & Chief Growth Officer, Faddom
Interactive briefing
Want the method behind these charts?
The Report replays the analysis live: the scored funnel, the findings, the 21-day pilot.
Case File No. 002 · Yours

Your CRM has charts like these in it.

A free 30-minute call is enough to tell whether your data can support the same kind of system.

Book a free data audit call